Fort Collins’ "Holiday Task Force" Recommendations Draw Community Ire

Displays like this could get the axe for being “too Christmas-y”

The inclusive, multicultural/diversity, and bureaucratic approach to the holidays taken up by Fort Collins has led to the ridiculous proposals put forth last week by the 17-member “holiday task force” designated to eliminate Christmas make the city’s displays more “educational”, drawing the ire of local residents:

“On the display you’ll see symbols and recognition and descriptions of all the various traditions that are celebrated here in Fort Collins,” said Seth Anthony, a spokesperson for the task force, which included representatives from a variety of secular and religious groups.

What appears to be attracting controversy is another recommendation that would not allow colored lights and other symbols associated with Christmas in other outside public areas.

“The council’s intent was to be positive, be expansive, to be more inclusive. I’m not sure why we would want to restrict any aspect of what has been years and years of traditional holiday displays,” said Fort Collins Mayor Doug Hutchinson, who has received angry calls from many people, some of whom claim the city is stealing Christmas.

However, those with the task force say its proposal is appropriate.

“We have to be careful that the displays that we have not endorse any particular religion. Putting things in a multicultural context, or an educational context really helps us be very safely on the good side of the First Amendment,” said Anthony, who is an ACLU member.

That said, Anthony adds Christmas would not be absent from Fort Collins if the recommendations were to pass. He says they would not prohibit Christmas trees or decorations inside public buildings and businesses would still throw up all sorts of Christmas displays.

I’m sure they’ll take care of those glaring omissions next year.

The flimsy reasoning continues:

Though the recommendation’s language does not address Christmas trees by name, the consensus among task force members was that Christmas trees would not fall within its recommendations, said Seth Anthony, spokesman for the task force.

“Some symbols, even though the Supreme Court has declared that in many contexts they are secular symbols, often still send a message to some members of the community that they and their traditions are not values and not wanted. We don’t want to send that message,” Anthony said.

But the Fort Collins museum’s display of white lights in trees on its grounds – including an evergreen tree lighted as part of the Downtown Business Association’s Community Holiday Tree lighting and Carolfest, could continue under the new recommendation, he said.

The task force also will recommend that the Fort Collins Museum develop a multicultural display of religious and cultural symbols or objects associated with a variety of winter holidays such as Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa and Diwali. Such a display could include such objects as a crèche with a star overhead, a menorah or a Kwanzaa kenora, to name a few.

The final decision for what is included in the display, which will likely be outdoors beginning in 2008, would rest with museum staff, Anthony said.

Because the Downtown Development Authority owns Old Town Square, any holiday display policies approved by council would not apply there.

“I expect criticism from people who feel like we are taking Christmas away. And I expect we will get criticism from people who think educational display endorses religions,” Anthony said. “(But) to the extent we can, recognizing that offending no one will be impossible, we want to be inclusive.”

For anti-Christmas moonbats, excluding Christmas trees = being more inclusive. Nuance. So is the inclusion of Anthony, the ACLU member. How many times were lawsuits mentioned before the rest of the task force finally conceded?

The negative feedback to the mayor of Fort Collins remains strong:

Mayor Doug Hutchinson said he was pleased with the proposal that focused on the museum but had questions about other proposals that could limit decorations on the exterior of most city buildings.

Said Hutchinson: “I have had an ocean of input. People are saying that the issue is not religious. It’s about a long-standing tradition. The basic intent (of the council) was not to destroy anything. When you do away with Christmas trees, when you are doing away with a tradition that people in Fort Collins hold dear; that is the nerve that was touched.”

The holiday task force believes that a museum would provide the proper venue for the dangerous religious symbols:

The Fort Collins Museum would be the focal point of a multicultural winter holiday display under recommendations released Tuesday by a city task force.

In a 10-page document, the Holiday Display Task Force outlined a proposal for an educational, multicultural display outside the museum representing a variety of religious and nonreligious celebrations that take place between Nov. 1 and Jan. 30.

“What the task force tried to accomplish was to craft holiday displays to celebrate our commonality and also to recognize the diversity of winter holidays celebrated by members of the community and to create a festive atmosphere during the winter season,” said Seth Anthony, one of the spokesmen for the task force.

Museum staff would design the display. The task force’s document included illustrations of symbols as examples of what could be included in the display, including a crèche with a star above, a menorah, a Yule log and a snowflake, among others.

Committee approved “festive atmosphere” to be exact. And just so the religiosity doesn’t get out of hand, they included “illustrations” of the permitted symbols. Apparently the Fort Collins Museum staff is either too stupid to know what should belong in a holiday display, or just simply can’t be trusted to make their own decisions.

Perhaps another wing could be added to the museum showcasing rights and traditions once enjoyed by Americans before the onset of malignant moonbattery.

Fort Collins’ "Holiday Display Task Force" Deemphasizes Christmas, Favoring "Winter Symbols" And Diversity

This display is too “Christmas-y” and therefore offensive to Fort Collins’ “holiday display task force”

Beginning with last year’s controversy over a Menorah display, Fort Collins’ holiday displays will be “festive” but decidedly less “Christmas-y” this year–a “secular winter celebration incorporating cultural and religious differences” (video). In order to avoid controversy and not offend anyone, Christmas elements will be deemphasized in favor of celebrating Fort Collins’ “diversity”–blue and white lights instead of red and green.

Who is responsible for the recommendations? Why Fort Collins’ own “holiday display task force”–17 “religious, cultural, and legal experts”. Holiday-by-committee will render the already watered-down displays into meaningless “winter symbols” when they issue their recommendation to the city council in the coming weeks.

Stop The ACLU–Friday Free For All

Fort Collins Forms Holiday Display ‘Task Force’

In a move that replaces legislative fiat with potential bureaucratic red tape, Fort Collins City Council has formed a holiday display citizen “task force” assigned to grapple with the pressing and difficult issue of whether or not to display a menorah during the “holidays”:

The Fort Collins City Council took the right approach to a difficult dilemma by agreeing to form a citizen task force to review the city’s holiday display policy.

For two years, the issue of whether a menorah could or should be allowed on city property has been left generally unresolved. City Council voted last year to continue its policy of not allowing unattended displays in Old Town, even after public forums dominated by discussion from residents who advocated the placement. While the menorah was rejected, the city does allow a Christmas tree to be placed in Old Town.

Tuesday’s decision, though, transcends the menorah issue to address the city’s guidelines for all holiday exhibits – an approach that is both sensible and inclusive.

The same goes with forming a citizens’ group made up of stakeholders from religious, business, social and government communities. It is hoped that a diverse group can form a diverse and, perhaps, creative approach that allows for free expression rather than exclusion. This group can start by studying how other communities have addressed what has become an all-too-common controversy throughout the nation.

This is, indeed, a community conversation. And it is one in which City Council may have to be led rather than lead on determining appropriate displays for public property.

A recommendation will be brought to the City Council by Oct. 31 and the council will vote on the issue at its Nov. 6 meeting.

City officials are touting their foresight, civic fortitude, and “inclusionary” undertaking:

“I am really delighted to see us taking this step,” said Mayor Doug Hutchinson. “We learned a lot about this issue two years ago, and I think Fort Collins is a great city, and I think great cities are inclusionary. I think what council is doing tonight is an act of proactive inclusion.”

The 20-member task force will include representatives from many different city organizations, both religious and secular in nature, city staff told council members.
Controversy arose during the holiday season in Fort Collins during the past two years when City Council voted to maintain its policy of not allowing unattended displays – including the menorah – in Old Town.
. . .
“I am pleased council is doing this,” said council member Kelly Ohlson, who suggested the task force at a study session. “I want to be clear, though, that we’re not telling any churches or businesses or property owners what they can do on their own property. This purely a policy about what the city can do on city property.”

“Inclusionary” bureaucracy. Gets you all warm and fuzzy!

We supported the display of a menorah in Fort Collins last December. That position hasn’t changed.

We just find it amusing that a 20 person task force has been created to study the issue. Thanks to the ACLU for necessitating such a wasteful and pointless bureaucratic process, as the city cowers behind bureaucracy to avoid ACLU lawsuits and deflect cries of discrimination.